Jan
25

Supreme Judicial Court Considers Whether To Place Level 2 Offenders On The Internet

The Supreme Judicial Court recently heard the case of Michael Moe & others vs. Chair of the Sex Offender Registry Board, SJC-11520, in which the court will decide:

Whether a July, 2013 amendment to the Sex Offender Registry Law — which requires that sex offender registry information of level two sex offenders now be published on the Internet — was intended to apply, and can constitutionally be applied, to persons classified as level two offenders before the effective date of the amendment; and whether the publication on the Internet of level two offender information would violate Federal and State due process, ex post facto, and double jeopardy protections.

Expanding the dissemination of information of Massachusetts Level 2 sex offenders would be devastating for many registered offenders. It would vastly expand the number of Massachusetts sex offenders whose home, work, and educational information is splashed across the Internet and will reduce the utility of the site run by the Sex Offender Registry Board, which presently only lists the highest risk Massachusetts Level 3 sex offenders.

If you are a Level 2 sex offender in Massachusetts and have questions regarding your Massachusetts sex offender classification or wants assistance in reviewing or seeking sex offender reclassification, you need a Boston sex offender attorney. Please contact Attorney Crouch at (617) 441-5111 or email him to set up a free, initial consultation. To request further information please contact us.

Jan
25

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Tells Sex Offender Registry Board To Consider Gender As A Classification Factor

The Associated Press reports that the Supreme Judicial Court overturned the classification of a former escort service manager as a low-level sex offender, finding that the state’s Sex Offender Registry Board should have considered research showing women are less likely than men to commit new sex offenses.

Boston sex offender attorney Andrew Crouch filed an amicus brief in the case on behalf of the Committee for Public Counsel Services and the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

The AP reports that:

The woman, who wasn’t identified in the court’s ruling, pleaded guilty in 2006 to federal charges stemming from her management of an escort service from 2000 to 2002, including one count of transporting a minor to engage in prostitution and one count of sex trafficking of children. She served 17 months in prison while awaiting trial before pleading guilty.

In 2008, the woman requested funds to hire an expert witness, arguing that the board’s guidelines didn’t encompass scientific research on female sex offenders. Her request was rejected by the board.

A hearing officer eventually found that she should be classified as a level one sex offender, the lowest level of offender, considered the least likely to reoffend and the least dangerous.

She appealed that decision, but a Superior Court judge upheld the board’s ruling. The Supreme Judicial Court granted the woman’s request for direct review.

In its ruling Wednesday, the SJC agreed with the woman that the hearing examiner abused his discretion by denying her request for funds for an expert witness who could testify on the subject of how infrequently female sex offenders commit new crimes when compared with men.

“We conclude that it was arbitrary and capricious for (the board) to classify Doe’s risk of re-offense and degree of dangerousness without considering the substantial evidence presented at the hearing concerning the effect of gender on recidivism,” Justice Barbara Lenk wrote for the court.

The court sent the case back to the board.

The woman’s lawyer said the ruling means the board can now either grant the woman’s request for expert witness funds and a new hearing or relieve her of the requirement to register as a sex offender.

“Our position is that she should not have to register as a sex offender at all,” she said.

“She was arrested nearly three years after she had voluntarily ceased the criminal conduct at issue. She had already addressed her substance abuse problems and had already left the prostitution business,” she said.

In a statement, the board said it will comply with the court’s order.

The court also said the board is required to ensure that its guidelines are based on “the available literature.”

“We do not purport to suggest a frequency with which the guidelines must be updated, but caution that guidelines that fail to heed growing scientific consensus in an area may undercut the individualized nature of the hearing to which a sex offender is entitled, an important due process right,” Lenk wrote.

Appellate courts are increasingly rejecting the Board’s classification of Massachusetts sex offenders based on outdated criteria. Such details can be crucial for Massachusetts Level 1 and 2 sex offenders who rely on the Sex Offender Registry Board, to properly classify individuals and differentiate them from Massachusetts Level 3 sex offenders.

If you are a Level 1 or 2 sex offender in Massachusetts and have questions regarding your Massachusetts sex offender classification or wants assistance in reviewing or seeking sex offender reclassification, you need a Boston sex offender attorney. Please contact Attorney Crouch at (617) 441-5111 or email him to set up a free, initial consultation. To request further information please contact us.

Jul
03

Massachusetts Legislature Passes Sex Offender Reforms For Level 2 Offenders

Multiple news outlets are reporting the news that both the Massachusetts House and Senate have agreed to language substantially changing sex offender laws in Massachusetts. The changes will impact all registered offenders. The reports provide:

Sen. Katherine Clark, D-Melrose, Chair of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary, recently announced that the Massachusetts legislature has enacted important measures to protect children and our communities from sex offenders. The reforms, sponsored by Senator Clark, were included in the Commonwealth’s fiscal year 2014 budget, passed today by both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

“Today the legislature took action to protect our children, and I am proud that these important public safety measures will, with the Governor’s signature, become law,” Clark said. “These critical reforms will strengthen our laws, allow for the reclassification of sex offenders, and provide more information to parents, caregivers and the agencies we depend on to keep our kids and communities safe.”

This set of reforms will allow the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB) to reclassify offenders if new information becomes available and will establish tools for better communication with law enforcement so that such information is accessible and necessary adjustments on an offender’s level of dangerousness can be made.

“I am particularly pleased that SORB will have the opportunity to reclassify offenders in light of new information,” said Rep. Paul Brodeur, D-Melrose. “These reforms will go a long way towards making the system as effective as possible.”

The most dangerous sex offenders will be required to register within two days of being released from custody. The law currently requires Level 2 and Level 3 sex offenders to annually register in person, but does not specify when they must first appear after being released from custody.

Also included are new information sharing procedures for the determination or reevaluation of a sex offender’s designation within the Sex Offender Registry Board and with other state agencies, as well as a commission to develop risk assessment protocols for sexual offenders.

“This legislation does several very important things to clarify and strengthen the sex offender registry laws resulting in better information being available to the public and the enhancement of child protection and public safety,” said Middlesex District Attorney Marian Ryan. “I am thankful to Senator Clark and the legislature for moving this important bill forward. As District Attorney, I am committed to doing all that I can to protect children, engage in prevention efforts, and punish those who abuse or exploit children. This bill will give us additional tools in that effort.”

The final budget, which includes these public safety provisions, now goes to Governor Deval Patrick for his consideration.

Level 2 offenders will also find their registration information placed on-line, as is presently done for Level 3 offenders. The Lowell Sun reports.

Expanding the dissemination of information of Massachusetts Level 2 sex offenders would be devastating for many registered offenders. It would vastly expand the number of Massachusetts sex offenders whose home, work, and educational information is splashed across the Internet and will reduce the utility of the site run by the Sex Offender Registry Board, which presently only lists the highest risk Massachusetts Level 3 sex offenders.

If you are a Level 2 sex offender in Massachusetts and have questions regarding your Massachusetts sex offender classification or wants assistance in reviewing or seeking sex offender reclassification, you need a Boston sex offender attorney. Please contact Attorney Crouch at (617) 441-5111 or email him to set up a free, initial consultation. To request further information please contact us.

Jun
09

Attorney Crouch Secures Reversal Of Client’s Failure To Register Conviction

In the recent case of Commonwealth v. Loring, 463 Mass. 1012 (2012), Attorney Crouch argued that a client’s conviction for failing to register as a sex offender should be reversed and the Supreme Judicial Court agreed, reversing his client’s conviction.

In Loring, the defendant was classified by the Sex Offender Registry Board as a level two sex offender. Defendant subsequently registered with the police department. When the defendant failed to register again a few months later during the month of his birth, he was charged with a single count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 6, 178F 1/2. Defendant pleaded guilty to the offense and Attorney Crouch later filed a motion to withdraw the guilty plea on his client’s behalf. His motion was denied by the trial court. Attorney Crouch appealed the case and the Supreme Judicial Court reversed, holding (1) although the defendant admitted during the plea hearing that he did not register in his birth month, the statute did not require him to do so; and (2) being under no obligation to register in his birth month, the defendant could not be convicted of the offense of failure to register.

If you have questions regarding your Massachusetts criminal appeal or Massachusetts sex offender registration case or to request further information, you need a Boston criminal appeals attorney. Please contact Attorney Crouch at (617) 441-5111 or email him to set up a free, initial consultation. To request further information please contact us.

Jun
09

Massachusetts Legislators Propose Allowing Limited Public Access To Level 1 Sex Offender Information

Legislators from around the state are proposing new legislation in the wake of the arrest of a Level 1 offender on multiple charges of child molestation.

State lawmakers from both political parties are lining up behind a bill to allow limited public access to information on Level 1 sex offenders and give the state Sex Offender Registry Board new power to update risk levels assigned to such convicts.

The proposed changes are driven by the case of John Burbine, a Wakefield man and Level 1 sex offender who was charged late last year with sexually abusing more than a dozen children at his wife’s unlicensed daycare business.

“What happened recently at an unlicensed day care in Wakefield was horrific and caused us to ask ourselves if there is more the law can do to protect the most innocent among us,” said Marblehead state Rep. Lori Ehrlich.

A reform bill introduced by Sen. Katherine Clark, Senate chairwoman of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary, and Rep. Paul Brodeur, both D-Melrose, has garnered support from 27 bipartisan cosponsors, and leaders of both the House and Senate have said amending the state’s Sex Offender Registry is a top priority this legislative session.

Ehrlich, while not a cosponsor of the bill, has thoroughly reviewed its contents and supports it.

“The bill seeks to protect children by closing some loopholes in the law,” explained Ehrlich. “Specifically, it strengthens our system of oversight of convicted sex offenders and ensures that citizens, local law enforcement and relevant state agencies have the information they need to do all they can to keep our kids safe.”

She believes the bill, with its strong bipartisan support, would further help accomplish that goal because it has been crafted “effectively, fairly and responsibly.”

If the bill becomes law, people could ask police if a specific person is listed on the Sex Offender Registry and obtain information about Level 1 offenders’ classification and conviction. According to Clark, the changes would allow people to check before hiring a babysitter or caregiver to see if the applicant is a sex offender.

“The worst feeling in the world as a parent is that you can’t protect your children,” she said.

Right now, no information on Level 1 offenders, such as Burbine, is publicly available.

Clark wants to allow limited public access to information on Level 1 offenders, whom the Sex Offender Registry Board has deemed to present the lowest risk of reoffending under the state’s three-tiered classification system.

Currently, if a civilian were to suspect that someone was a Level 1 offender and inquired about that person to the Marblehead Police Department, police would not, under state law, be able to hand that information over, according to Marblehead Police Department Chief Robert Picariello

“The department follows the law, and the law only allows us to disseminate information on Level 2 and Level 3 sex offenders,” explained Picariello. “So we follow what the law says and guidelines set forth by the Sex Offender Registry Board.”

While not offering up an opinion on the bill, Picariello said, “The more information we can give people to make them feel safe, the better.”

Clark’s potential legislation would also establish the presumption that any sex offender convicted of a crime involving a child should be classified at least at Level 2, unless he or she can present evidence otherwise.

Her proposed bill would also address a court decision that stopped the Sex Offender Registry Board from reclassifying sex offenders based on new information. While the board had done this in the past, a 2012 court ruling, John Doe vs. Sex Offender Registry Board, established that state law does not give it the authority to do so.

Proposed legislation would explicitly spell out that the board does indeed have the power to reclassify.

“If we have information that the person is a greater threat or, for that matter, a lesser threat, then [the board] ought to be able to take into account,” Clark said. “Otherwise, we’ve frozen the system at a moment in time that may not be accurate.”

Parts of the bill seek to open up lines of communication among police, prosecutors and the Sex Offender Registry Board to share new information on offenders. Clark said she wants to give agencies responsible for child safety direct access to the Sex Offender Registry.

“I’m all for [lawmakers] looking at it and seeing if we can make people feel more safe, especially if this law would allow me and the department to make Marblehead safer,” said Picariello. “But, at this time, we comply with the [current] law.”

After a May 7 hearing on the proposed bill, Clark said the judiciary committee would likely take a few weeks to decide what action to recommend to the full Legislature.

Meanwhile, Ehrlich has already made up her mind on the bill, saying, “If it comes to the floor, I will be happy to vote for it.”

Expanding the dissemination of information of Massachusetts Level 1 and 2 sex offenders would be devastating for many registered offenders. It would vastly expand the number of Massachusetts sex offenders whose home, work, and educational information would be available on the Internet or to the public and will reduce the utility of the site run by the Sex Offender Registry Board, which presently only lists the highest risk Massachusetts Level 3 sex offenders.

If you are a Level 1 or 2 sex offender in Massachusetts and have questions regarding your Massachusetts sex offender classification or wants assistance in reviewing or seeking sex offender reclassification, you need a Boston sex offender attorney. Please contact Attorney Crouch at (617) 441-5111 or email him to set up a free, initial consultation. To request further information please contact us.

Older posts «

» Newer posts